Indie film financing and movie distribution reminds of what would feel like moving nude on stage (much respect for exotic ballet dancers at Larry Flynt’s Hustler Club! ). You show up to pitch your movie project and need to be able to dance to a film investor’s music. It’s their stage and not your own as an indie filmmaker seeking film funding. They need you to make a sellable movie which is of interest to movie distributors so the production can make money. fmovies
Most investors We’ve met with are not considering putting hard money into indie art house films because those are tough sells to movie distributors and overseas film buyers aren’t usually considering seeing them. The talk and scenes of certain art house type motion pictures don’t translate well to foreign buyers and movie viewers. Action, horror and skin doesn’t have subtitles for folks to follow the storyline is what I’ve been told by distributors. Talking head films can make no sense to viewers that miss subtle lines spoken in a foreign language.
3rd party film financing continues to change as indie movie distribution gets more monetarily shaky. The spot it’s striking indie movie producers most difficult is right at the source – film funding. Film investors right now aren’t feeling excited about putting money into films which often not have bankable name actors. This is not like so-called films which may have A-list actors and produced for millions of dollars. Those type of indie film passion jobs you can make once you’ve achieved it in the entertainment business at the studio level.
Indie film investors and movie vendors won’t are expecting you to have an A-list actor, nevertheless they do want producers to acquire actors (B-list or C-list or D-list) with some name reputation or celebrity. The first film investors and movie distributors ask is who the cast is. This is when most indie movie suppliers are blown out of the water because they have an unknown players of actors. Plus there exists a glut of indie videos being created because technology has made it more affordable to make films.
The bright side is that entertaining indie videos are being made which may not otherwise ever have observed light of day before. The downside is important movie distribution (getting paid) for indie produced videos continue to be shrink as indie films being made increases (supply and demand 101). I talked to one movie distributor that serves to releasing independent motion pictures and they told myself they receive new film submissions daily.
They were honest saying they get very sellable movies and ones that are much less than appealing, but with so many videos out there they no longer give you a most producers progress money against film royalties or pay a large cash “buy-out” to secure distribution rights. Their business viewpoint is most indie filmmakers are just happy seeing their movie released. The term they used was “glorified showreel” for an indie filmmaker to display they can make a feature film. Consequently, they acquire many of their movie releases without paying an advance or offering a “buy-out” arrangement.
Not making an earnings from a movie would not make financial sense for film investors that expect to see money made. When people put up money to produce a movie they want an excellent return on their investment. Normally it’s no longer a movie investment. It is a film donation of money they’re giving away with no expectations. Seems on the “dog and horse show” circuit ending up in potential film shareholders and learning invaluable lessons.